ALL THAT GLITTERS IS NOT GOLD: THE EFFECTS OF MATERIALISM, LUXURY PARTICIPATION, AND INCOME ON SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING

Jeff Langenderfer, Meredith College, Raleigh, NC, U.S.A.
Bani Taunque, Meredith College, Raleigh, NC, U.S.A.
Richa Kulkarni, Meredith College, Raleigh, NC, U.S.A.

Published in

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCE AND ECONOMICS
Volume 20, Issue 1, p29-38, March 2020

ABSTRACT

For centuries, human beings have been told by philosophers, writers, and religious leaders that money cannot buy happiness, and indeed, current research strongly indicates that materialism, or a focus on material goods and consumption, reduces subjective well-being, a proxy for long-term happiness. Recent studies, however, have shown mixed results of the effects of consumption on well-being. Can buying things truly make people happier? This study, involving 400 Mechanical Turk participants, examines the interplay between Materialism, Income, Luxury Participation, and Subjective Well-Being (SWB). Consistent with prior research, results suggest that there is a negative main effect of Materialism on SWB. However, for higher income respondents, the effect is attenuated or absent. For those who have the means to participate in the market for luxuries, it seems that it isn’t so bad to be materialistic.

Keywords

materialism, luxury, income, well-being


About the Article

Abstract, Keywords, Page Numbers, etc

About the Journal

Managing Editors, Indexing, Best Practices

About The Publisher

History, Partners, Conferences

Access the Full Article

Log-in to IABE to access full article

Search IABE

Search IABE's articles by Title, Author, or keyword

Contact Us

Send a message to IABE