ARE BANK LOAN OFFICERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF LITIGATION-RELATED CLAUSES CONSISTENT WITH REGULATORS AND STANDARD SETTERS?

Aisha Meeks, Morehouse College, U.S.A.
Nicole McCoy, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S.A.
Dave Thompson, Alabama State University, U.S.A.

Published in

JOURNAL OF ACADEMY OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS
Volume 21, Issue 4, p47-55, December 2021

ABSTRACT

This study examines the perception of bank loan officers’ views on auditor use of litigation-related clauses (LRCs) in audit-client engagement letters. The results indicate that loan officers believe management is legally liable for the accuracy of company financial statements. Additionally, we find that bank loan officers perceive that certain LRCs communicate a commitment that company management and its governing board understand their responsibilities to perform honestly and legally. However, bank loan officers’ perceptions of auditor independence, objectivity, and professional skepticism are negatively affected by the usage of LRCs. Finally, findings imply agreement among loan officers with regulators and standard setters that the use of such clauses can adversely affect financial statement reliability.

Keywords

Auditor Liability, Litigation-Related Clause, Auditor Independence, Objectivity, Professional Skepticism


About the Article

Abstract, Keywords, Page Numbers, etc

About the Journal

Managing Editors, Indexing, Best Practices

About The Publisher

History, Partners, Conferences

Access the Full Article

Log-in to IABE to access full article

Search IABE

Search IABE's articles by Title, Author, or keyword

Contact Us

Send a message to IABE